Consider the following statements about the arms used by Europeans in warfare in India:

1. The flint-lock muskets could work even in wet weather.

2. The addition of bayonet made musket a more effective and dangerous weapon in close combat.

3. The wrought-iron cannon barrels were easy to move and manoeuvre.

How many of the above statements is/are correct?

The correct answer is Option 1.

Key Points

• Statement 1: The flint-lock muskets were unreliable in wet weather as the ignition system depended on dry powder, making this statement incorrect.
• Statement 2: The addition of bayonet indeed made muskets more effective for close combat, converting them into dual-purpose weapons. This statement is correct.
• Statement 3: Wrought-iron cannon barrels were heavy and difficult to move, contrary to the claim. This statement is incorrect.
• Thus, only Statement 2 is correct, making the correct option 1.

Additional Information

• Flint-lock muskets: These firearms were widely used in the 17th and 18th centuries. Their ignition system relied on striking a flint against steel to produce sparks, igniting the gunpowder.
• Bayonet: A blade attached to the muzzle of a musket or rifle, transforming the firearm into a spear-like weapon for close-range combat.
• Wrought-iron cannon barrels: These were durable but very heavy, requiring significant manpower or animals for transportation and maneuvering.
• European warfare advancements: Europeans introduced more sophisticated firearms and artillery in India, giving them a strategic edge in battles.
• Military evolution: The combination of firearms and melee weapons like bayonets marked a transition in warfare tactics, blending ranged and close combat capabilities effectively.