BNS MCQ Quiz - Objective Question with Answer for BNS - Download Free PDF

Last updated on Mar 26, 2025

Latest BNS MCQ Objective Questions

BNS Question 1:

Which of the following acts would NOT amount to an offense under Section 325 of BNS?

  1. Poisoning a neighbor’s pet dog with malicious intent
  2. Maiming cattle belonging to a farmer to cause loss
  3. Rendering a working animal useless by injuring it
  4. Feeding an animal properly and taking care of its health

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 4 : Feeding an animal properly and taking care of its health

BNS Question 1 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is Feeding an animal properly and taking care of its health

Key Points

  • Section 325 of BNS says, Whoever commits mischief by killing, poisoning, maiming or rendering useless any animal shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both.

BNS Question 2:

Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the offense of mischief under Section 324 of BNS?

  1. Mischief requires the intent to harm the owner of the property.
  2. Mischief can be committed only against another person's property, not one’s own.
  3. Mischief includes acts that destroy or diminish the value or utility of property.
  4. A person cannot be guilty of mischief if the property damaged belongs to him.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Mischief includes acts that destroy or diminish the value or utility of property.

BNS Question 2 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is Mischief includes acts that destroy or diminish the value or utility of property

Key Points

  • Section 324 of BNS says, Whoever with intent to cause, or knowing that he is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to the public or to any person, causes the destruction of any property, or any such change in any property or in the situation thereof as destroys or diminishes its value or utility, or affects it injuriously, commits mischief.
  • Explanation 1 -It is not essential to the offence of mischief that the offender should intend to cause loss or damage to the owner of the property injured or destroyed. It is sufficient if he intends to cause, or knows that he is likely to cause, wrongful loss or damage to any person by injuring any property, whether it belongs to that person or not.
  • Explanation 2 -Mischief may be committed by an act affecting property belonging to the person who commits the act, or to that person and others jointly.

BNS Question 3:

Which of the following acts constitutes an offense under Section 322 of BNS?

  1. Fraudulently signing or executing a deed that falsely states the consideration for the transfer of property
  2. Becoming a party to an instrument that misrepresents the actual beneficiary of a property transfer
  3. Dishonestly executing a document that falsely purports to subject a property to a charge
  4. All of the above

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 4 : All of the above

BNS Question 3 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is ​All of the above

Key Points

  • Section 322 of BNS criminalizes dishonest or fraudulent execution, signing, or participation in any deed or instrument that falsely represents the consideration, intended beneficiary, or nature of a property transfer or charge. The law aims to prevent fraudulent documentation that could mislead parties or authorities about the true nature of a transaction. The punishment includes imprisonment for up to three years, a fine, or both. 

BNS Question 4:

Which of the following constitutes an offense under Section 321 of BNS?

  1. Fraudulently preventing a debt due to oneself from being used to pay off one’s own debts
  2. Dishonestly preventing a debt due to another person from being used to pay off their debts
  3. Both A and B
  4. None of the above

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Both A and B

BNS Question 4 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is Both A and B

Key Points

  • Section 321 of BNS criminalizes any act of dishonestly or fraudulently preventing a debt or demand due to oneself or another person from being used according to law for settling debts. This ensures that debts are not unlawfully concealed or obstructed from being utilized for their rightful legal purpose. The punishment for this offense includes imprisonment for up to two years, a fine, or both.

BNS Question 5:

As per Section 320 of BNS, which of the following acts constitutes an offense?

  1. Dishonestly removing or concealing property to prevent its lawful distribution among creditors.
  2. Fraudulently transferring property to another person without adequate consideration.
  3. Knowingly preventing the distribution of property according to law among creditors.
  4. All of the above.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 4 : All of the above.

BNS Question 5 Detailed Solution

The correct answer is All of the above

Key Points

  • According to Section 320 of BNS, it is an offense to dishonestly or fraudulently remove, conceal, deliver, or transfer property without adequate consideration with the intent or knowledge that it will prevent its lawful distribution among creditors. Such acts are punishable with imprisonment of at least six months, which may extend to two years, or with a fine, or both. 

Top BNS MCQ Objective Questions

When did the Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita Bill, 2023 receive the assent of the President of India?

  1. 15 August 2023
  2. 25 September 2023
  3. 30 October 2023
  4. 25 December 2023

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 4 : 25 December 2023

BNS Question 6 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF
The correct answer is 25 December 2023

In News

  • India’s three new criminal laws — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam — take effect today (July 1).
  • On 11 August 2023, Amit Shah, the Minister of Home Affairs, introduced the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bill, 2023 in the Lok Sabha. However, on 12 December 2023, this bill was withdrawn.
  • On the same day, the Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita Bill, 2023 was introduced in the Lok Sabha. Subsequently, on December 20 2023, the Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita Bill, 2023 was passed in the Lok Sabha.
  • The following day, on 21 December 2023, it was passed in the Rajya Sabha. Finally, on 25 December 2023, the Bharatiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita Bill, 2023 received the assent of the President of India.

 

Key Points

  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (c):
    • Purpose: Official criminal code of the Republic of India.
    • Effective Date: Came into effect on 1 July 2024.
    • Legislative Background: Passed by the Parliament in December 2023.
    • Replaced Legislation: Replaces the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which was established during British India.
    • Structure:
      • Comprises 20 chapters and 358 sections.
      • Structure is similar to the IPC.
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS):
    • Purpose: Main legislation for the procedure of administering substantive criminal law in India.
    • Key Provisions:
      • Bail and Plea Bargaining: Makes it more difficult for the accused to secure bail and limits the scope for plea bargaining.
      • Digital Devices: Empowers police officers to compel an accused to produce their digital devices for investigation purposes.
      • Property Seizure: Allows police the discretion to seize and attach the property of an accused before a trial.
      • Preliminary Inquiry: Mandates a preliminary inquiry by the police before lodging an FIR for every cognisable offence punishable for three years or more but less than seven years.
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023:
    • Purpose: Acts as the Indian Evidence Act.
    • Legislative Changes:
      • Consists of 170 sections compared to 167 sections in the previous Indian Evidence Act.
      • Modifications: 23 sections have been modified, five sections removed, and one new section added.

Which is/are of the following is not correctly match regarding the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023:

  1. Extortion - 302
  2. Criminal Breach of Trust - 316
  3. Receiving of Stolen Property - 317
  4. Defamation - 356

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 1 : Extortion - 302

BNS Question 7 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF
The correct answer is Extortion - 302

In News

  • India’s three new criminal laws — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam — take effect today (July 1).
  • Chapter 17
    • Extortion (308) 
    • Criminal Breach of Trust (316)
    • Receiving of Stolen Property (317)
  • Chapter 19
    • Defamation (356)

 

Key Points

  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS):
    • Purpose: Official criminal code of the Republic of India.
    • Effective Date: Came into effect on 1 July 2024.
    • Legislative Background: Passed by the Parliament in December 2023.
    • Replaced Legislation: Replaces the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which was established during British India.
    • Structure:
      • Comprises 20 chapters and 358 sections.
      • Structure is similar to the IPC.
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS):
    • Purpose: Main legislation for the procedure of administering substantive criminal law in India.
    • Key Provisions:
      • Bail and Plea Bargaining: Makes it more difficult for the accused to secure bail and limits the scope for plea bargaining.
      • Digital Devices: Empowers police officers to compel an accused to produce their digital devices for investigation purposes.
      • Property Seizure: Allows police the discretion to seize and attach the property of an accused before a trial.
      • Preliminary Inquiry: Mandates a preliminary inquiry by the police before lodging an FIR for every cognisable offence punishable for three years or more but less than seven years.
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023:
    • Purpose: Acts as the Indian Evidence Act.
    • Legislative Changes:
      • Consists of 170 sections compared to 167 sections in the previous Indian Evidence Act.
      • Modifications: 23 sections have been modified, five sections removed, and one new section added.

Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 replaces which controversial law?

  1. Sedition law
  2. Blasphemy law
  3. Defamation law
  4. Cyber-crime law

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 1 : Sedition law

BNS Question 8 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF
The correct answer is Sedition law

In News

  • India’s three new criminal laws — Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam — take effect today (July 1).
  • The most significant colonial remnant in our criminal laws is the IPC’s ‘Offences Against the State’ chapter, which includes sedition under Section 124A.
  • In the BNS, this has been replaced by Section 152, titled ‘Act Endangering Sovereignty, Unity and Integrity of India,’ with some differences from the original IPC offense.

Key Points

  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS):
    • Purpose: Official criminal code of the Republic of India.
    • Effective Date: Came into effect on 1 July 2024.
    • Legislative Background: Passed by the Parliament in December 2023.
    • Replaced Legislation: Replaces the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which was established during British India.
    • Structure:
      • Comprises 20 chapters and 358 sections.
      • Structure is similar to the IPC.
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS):
    • Purpose: Main legislation for the procedure of administering substantive criminal law in India.
    • Key Provisions:
      • Bail and Plea Bargaining: Makes it more difficult for the accused to secure bail and limits the scope for plea bargaining.
      • Digital Devices: Empowers police officers to compel an accused to produce their digital devices for investigation purposes.
      • Property Seizure: Allows police the discretion to seize and attach the property of an accused before a trial.
      • Preliminary Inquiry: Mandates a preliminary inquiry by the police before lodging an FIR for every cognizable offence punishable for three years or more but less than seven years.
  • Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023:
    • Purpose: Acts as the Indian Evidence Act.
    • Legislative Changes:
      • Consists of 170 sections compared to 167 sections in the previous Indian Evidence Act.
      • Modifications: 23 sections have been modified, five sections removed, and one new section added.

According to Section 18 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which of the following scenarios is not considered an offense?

  1. Accidentally causing harm while performing a lawful act with proper care
  2. Deliberately causing harm with the intent to prevent a greater harm
  3. Acting with criminal intent while performing a lawful act
  4. Misinterpreting a legal order and causing harm unintentionally

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 1 : Accidentally causing harm while performing a lawful act with proper care

BNS Question 9 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF

The correct answer is Option 1

Key Points

  • Section 18. Accident in Performing a Lawful Act
  • An act is not considered an offense if it occurs accidentally or by misfortune, without criminal intent or knowledge, while performing a lawful act in a lawful manner, with appropriate care and caution.
  • Illustration:
    • A is using a hatchet, and the head of the hatchet flies off and kills a bystander. If A exercised proper caution, the incident is excusable and not deemed an offense.

Under BNS, what is the penalty for a member of an unlawful assembly who is armed with a deadly weapon according to Section 189(4)?

  1. Imprisonment of up to six months
  2. Imprisonment of up to one year
  3. Imprisonment of up to two years or with fine, or with both
  4. Fine only

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Imprisonment of up to two years or with fine, or with both

BNS Question 10 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF

The correct answer is Option 3

Key Points Section 189: Unlawful Assembly

Definition of Unlawful Assembly: An assembly of five or more persons is deemed an "unlawful assembly" if its common objective is:

  • To intimidate by criminal force or show of criminal force the Central or State Government, Parliament, any State Legislature, or a public servant in the exercise of lawful duties.
  • To resist the execution of any law or legal process.
  • To commit mischief, criminal trespass, or any other offense.
  • To use or threaten criminal force to take possession of property, deprive someone of a right of way, or enforce a right or supposed right.
  • To use or threaten criminal force to compel someone to do something they are not legally bound to do, or to prevent them from doing something they are legally entitled to do.

Explanation: An assembly that was initially lawful may later become unlawful.

  • Participation in an Unlawful Assembly: Anyone who, knowing the assembly is unlawful, intentionally joins or continues to be part of it shall be punished with imprisonment up to six months, or a fine, or both.
  • Failure to Disperse: Anyone who remains in an unlawful assembly after it has been lawfully commanded to disperse shall be punished with imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both.
  • Armed Members: If a member of an unlawful assembly is armed with a deadly weapon or anything that could cause death, they shall be punished with imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both. [Section 189(4)]
  • Disturbance of Public Peace: Anyone who knowingly joins or continues in an assembly likely to disturb public peace after being ordered to disperse shall be punished with imprisonment up to six months, or a fine, or both.
  • Explanation: If the assembly meets the definition of unlawful assembly in subsection (1), the punishment under subsection (3) applies.
  • Hiring for Unlawful Assembly: Anyone who hires, engages, or encourages another to join an unlawful assembly shall be punished as if they were a member of that assembly and for any crimes committed by that assembly.
  • Harboring Members of an Unlawful Assembly: Anyone who harbors, receives, or assembles people knowing they have been hired or are about to join an unlawful assembly shall be punished with imprisonment up to six months, or a fine, or both.
  • Engagement in Unlawful Acts: Anyone engaged, hired, or attempting to be hired to assist in carrying out any unlawful acts described in subsection (1) shall be punished with imprisonment up to six months, or a fine, or both.
  • Armed Engagement: Anyone hired or engaged to join an unlawful assembly who goes armed with a deadly weapon or anything likely to cause death shall be punished with imprisonment up to two years, or a fine, or both.

According to Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, what is the intent required for the crime described in Section 140(3)?

  1. To compel the government to act
  2. To cause death
  3. To cause wrongful confinement
  4. To demand ransom

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : To cause wrongful confinement

BNS Question 11 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF

The correct answer is Option 3

Key PointsSection 140: Kidnapping or Abducting in Order to Murder or for Ransom, etc.

  • Kidnapping/Abducting with Intent to Murder: Whoever kidnaps or abducts any person with the intent that the person may be murdered or placed in a situation where they are in danger of being murdered shall be punished with:
    • Imprisonment for life, or
    • Rigorous imprisonment for a term of up to ten years, and
    • Shall also be liable to a fine.

According to Section 23 of the BNS, 2023, an act is not an offence if it is committed by a person under intoxication, only if:

  1. The person was a habitual drinker
  2. The intoxication was self-induced
  3. The intoxicating substance was taken with medical advice
  4. The intoxication was without his knowledge or against his will, and he was incapable of understanding the nature or wrongfulness of the act

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 4 : The intoxication was without his knowledge or against his will, and he was incapable of understanding the nature or wrongfulness of the act

BNS Question 12 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF

The correct answer is Option 4

Key Points

  • ​Section 23 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 provides that: "Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that it is wrong or contrary to law, provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered without his knowledge or against his will."
  • So, to claim exemption from liability, the following must be proven:
    • The person was incapable of understanding the act due to intoxication,
    • And the intoxication was involuntary (without knowledge or against his will).
  • Voluntary intoxication is not a valid defence under this section.

 

R, suffering from a severe mental disorder, kills S during a psychotic episode. At the time of the act, R was incapable of understanding the nature of his actions or knowing that what he did was wrong or illegal. Under Section 22 of the BNS, R:

  1. Is guilty of murder because killing is a punishable offence
  2. Is not guilty, as he lacked the mental capacity to understand his act
  3. Will be punished with a lesser sentence due to his illness
  4. Will be presumed to have intended the consequences of his act

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 : Is not guilty, as he lacked the mental capacity to understand his act

BNS Question 13 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF

The correct answer is Is not guilty, as he lacked the mental capacity to understand his act

Key Points

  • Under Section 22 of the BNS, 2023, a person is not criminally liable if, at the time of the act, due to unsoundness of mind, they:
    • Cannot understand the nature of the act,
    • Or cannot recognize that it is wrong or contrary to law.
  • In this case, R meets both conditions.
  • Therefore, no offence is committed, even if the act (like killing) is serious, because criminal intent (mens rea) is absent.

According to Section 21 of the BNS, 2023, a child between 7 and 12 years of age is not criminally liable if:

  1. The offence committed is not serious
  2.  The child acts under parental guidance
  3. The child has not attained sufficient maturity to understand the nature and consequences of the act
  4. The child confesses to the crime

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : The child has not attained sufficient maturity to understand the nature and consequences of the act

BNS Question 14 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF

The correct answer is Option 3

Key Points

  • Section 21 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 states: "Nothing is an offence which is done by a child above seven years of age and under twelve years of age, who has not attained sufficient maturity of understanding to judge of the nature and consequences of his conduct on that occasion."
  • This section:
    • Recognizes that children in the 7-12 age group are in a transitional maturity stage.
    • Their criminal liability depends on whether they had the maturity to understand the wrongful nature of the act at the time it was committed.
    • It is a question of fact in each case, to be determined by the court.
  • This provision corresponds to Section 83 of the IPC.

As per Section 44 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, the right of private defence against a deadly assault extends even if:

  1.  The defender can easily escape
  2. There is a risk of harm to an innocent person
  3.  The defender has an alternative non-violent option
  4. The attacker is unarmed

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 : There is a risk of harm to an innocent person

BNS Question 15 Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF

The correct answer is Option 2

Key Points According to Section 44 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, if a person is under reasonable apprehension of death and cannot defend himself without risking harm to an innocent person, his right of private defence remains valid. This ensures that a person can protect themselves even in complex situations.

Get Free Access Now
Hot Links: teen patti master 2024 teen patti teen patti joy official teen patti rummy teen patti party