Directions: In the question below is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume all the information in the statement to be true, then consider the conclusions and decide which of them can definitely be drawn from the given statement. Select the correct option.

Statement: Countries that have invested heavily in public healthcare infrastructure have demonstrated better resilience against health crises. Such nations also report lower economic disruptions and faster recovery rates during widespread health emergencies.

Conclusions:

I. A strong public healthcare system contributes to a nation's ability to manage health crises effectively.

II. Investing in healthcare can have a direct impact on a country’s economic stability.

Given statement: Countries that have invested heavily in public healthcare infrastructure have demonstrated better resilience against health crises. Such nations also report lower economic disruptions and faster recovery rates during widespread health emergencies.

Given conclusions:

I. A strong public healthcare system contributes to a nation's ability to manage health crises effectively. → Follow

As well-funded hospitals, advanced medical facilities, and accessible healthcare services help nations manage outbreaks, treat patients efficiently, and reduce mortality rates, thereby confirming the conclusion.

II. Investing in healthcare can have a direct impact on a country’s economic stability. → Follow

A direct link between healthcare investment and economic stability. Countries with robust healthcare systems experience lower economic disruptions during health emergencies, likely due to fewer work absences, reduced healthcare costs, and faster recovery times. This suggests that proactive healthcare spending can safeguard economies from severe downturns during crises.

Thus, Both I and II follows.

Hence, "Option 3" is the correct answer.