Directions: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.

Statement: Should governments implement Universal Basic Income (UBI) for all citizens regardless of employment status?

Arguments:

I. Providing a fixed income to all citizens will eliminate poverty and ensure economic stability.

II. AI replacing human intelligence in security decisions may lead to biased or incorrect threat assessments.

  1. Both I and II are strong
  2. Only argument II is strong 
  3. Only argument I is strong 
  4. Either I or II is strong
  5. Neither I nor II is strong 

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 : Only argument II is strong 

Detailed Solution

Download Solution PDF

Given Statement: Should governments implement Universal Basic Income (UBI) for all citizens regardless of employment status?

Given Arguments:

I. Providing a fixed income to all citizens will eliminate poverty and ensure economic stability. Weak

As UBI alone does not eliminate poverty; inflation and reduced work incentives may offset its benefits. Past trials (e.g., Finland) showed no clear long-term economic stability.

II. Funding UBI requires massive tax increases or budget cuts, which may destabilize the economy and burden taxpayers. Strong

As UBI demands huge financial resources, leading to higher taxes or cuts in essential services like healthcare and education. Inflation risks and economic instability make large-scale implementation unsustainable.

Hence, Only argument II is strong.

Hence, "Option 2" is the correct answer.

More Statements and Arguments Questions

Get Free Access Now
Hot Links: teen patti chart teen patti star login teen patti bliss teen patti lotus teen patti bodhi