Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants MCQ Quiz - Objective Question with Answer for Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants - Download Free PDF

Last updated on Mar 24, 2025

Latest Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants MCQ Objective Questions

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 1:

What is the maximum term of imprisonment for non-appearance in response to a proclamation issued under Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023?

  1. Three years.
  2. Five years.
  3. Seven years.
  4. Ten years.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 1 : Three years.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 1 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 3.

Key Points 

Explanation:

  • Under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (2023), a person who fails to appear as required by a proclamation issued under Section 84 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita  can be punished with imprisonment for up to three years, a fine, or both. Additionally, community service may be imposed as a punishment.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 2:

Under Section 220, what type of offense is committed when someone illegally bids or purchases property during a sale by a public servant?

  1. Intentionally obstructing a lawful sale of property.
  2. Offering resistance to the authority of the public servant.
  3. Purchasing or bidding for property when under a legal incapacity.
  4. Failing to attend a public auction.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Purchasing or bidding for property when under a legal incapacity.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 2 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 3.

Key Points

 Explanation:

  • Section 220  of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 deals with illegal purchases or bids at property sales conducted by public servants. If someone bids for property or purchases it knowing that the person (whether themselves or others) is legally incapacitated from doing so (e.g., due to a restriction), they have committed an offense. The penalty for this is imprisonment for up to one month, a fine of up to 200 rupees, or both.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 3:

What will happen if disobedience to an order causes danger to human life or safety or results in a riot?

  1.  Fine of ₹5,000
  2. Imprisonment for up to 3 months
  3. Imprisonment for up to one year or a fine of ₹5,000
  4. No punishment

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Imprisonment for up to one year or a fine of ₹5,000

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 3 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 3.

Key Points 

Explanation:

  • Section 223 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023  states that if disobedience to an order leads to a more severe consequence, such as endangering human life, health, or safety, or causing a riot or affray, the punishment is more severe. The person responsible can face imprisonment for up to one year, a fine of up to ₹5,000, or both. This part of the law is designed to ensure that violations which could lead to public unrest or harm receive stricter penalties to maintain peace and order.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 4:

What is the penalty for threatening a person to refrain from applying for protection to a public servant?

  1. Imprisonment for up to 6 months or a fine
  2.  Imprisonment for up to 2 years or a fine
  3. Imprisonment for up to 1 year
  4. No penalty

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 :  Imprisonment for up to 2 years or a fine

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 4 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 2.

Key Points

 Explanation:

  • Section 225 of  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 deals with threatening a person to prevent them from applying for protection from a public servant. This type of threat is aimed at preventing an individual from seeking legal recourse or protection. Such acts of coercion are punishable with imprisonment for up to two years or a fine. The intent of this law is to protect the individual's right to seek justice and protection from harm.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 5:

What is the punishment for attempting suicide with the intent to influence a public servant's actions?

  1. Simple imprisonment for up to 1 year
  2. Imprisonment for up to 2 years or fine
  3.  Fine up to ₹5,000
  4.  Community service only

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 1 : Simple imprisonment for up to 1 year

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 5 Detailed Solution

 The correct Answer is Option 1. 

Key Points 

Explanation:

  • Section 226 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 addresses the act of attempting suicide to manipulate or restrain a public servant from performing their official duties. This section treats such actions seriously because the attempt is made with the intent to control the behavior of a public servant. The punishment for such an offense is simple imprisonment for a term that may extend to one year, or a fine, or both, or the imposition of community service. This law aims to prevent individuals from using extreme measures to influence the performance of public duties unlawfully.

Top Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants MCQ Objective Questions

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 6:

Under Section 207 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, which action is considered a punishable offense?

  1. Refusing to attend a court hearing after receiving a summons.
  2.  Intentionally preventing the service of a summons or notice.
  3. Ignoring a summons but not actively preventing its service.
  4. Not appearing in court after being summoned due to a valid medical excuse.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 :  Intentionally preventing the service of a summons or notice.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 6 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 2.

Key Points 

Explanation:

  • Section 207 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita specifically addresses the act of intentionally preventing the service of a summons, notice, or order issued by a legally competent public servant. The punishment is for actively hindering or removing such documents from their lawful place of service or affixing.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 7:

In which scenario does Section 217 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita apply?

  1. When a person gives false testimony under oath in a court of law.
  2. When a person deliberately misleads a public servant about a crime to avoid being investigated.
  3.  When a person refuses to answer questions posed by a public servant during an investigation.
  4. When someone intentionally gives false information to a public servant, knowing that it will lead to the harm or annoyance of another person.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 4 : When someone intentionally gives false information to a public servant, knowing that it will lead to the harm or annoyance of another person.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 7 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 4.Key Points

Explanation:

  • Section 217 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita specifically targets situations where a person intentionally gives false information to a public servant, knowing or intending that it will cause harm or annoyance to another person. This can involve making false claims that lead to wrongful actions by the public servant, like unnecessary searches or investigations.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 8:

Under Section 216 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, what is the maximum imprisonment term for making a false statement under oath or affirmation to a public servant?

  1. One year.
  2. Two years
  3. Three years.
  4. No imprisonment term applies.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Three years.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 8 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 3.

Key Points

Explanation:

  • Under Section 216 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita , a person who makes a false statement under oath or affirmation to a public servant (or any authorized person) faces a maximum sentence of three years of imprisonment. This severe punishment reflects the serious nature of lying under oath, as it can undermine the legal process and lead to miscarriages of justice

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 9:

Which of the following scenarios is a violation of Section 212 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita?

  1. A person omits to pay a fine
  2.  A person forgets to notify the police about a crime in progress.
  3. A landholder misinforms the Magistrate about a death, claiming it was caused by a snake bite instead of murder.
  4.  A witness fails to attend court after being summoned.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : A landholder misinforms the Magistrate about a death, claiming it was caused by a snake bite instead of murder.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 9 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 3.

Key Points

 Explanation:

Section 212 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita "criminalizes the act of furnishing false information to a public servant. In this example, the landholder is intentionally giving false information about the cause of a death (murder instead of an accident), which violates the law because it obstructs the proper investigation of a crime.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 10:

What is the maximum term of imprisonment for non-appearance in response to a proclamation issued under Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023?

  1. Three years.
  2. Five years.
  3. Seven years.
  4. Ten years.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 1 : Three years.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 10 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 3.

Key Points 

Explanation:

  • Under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (2023), a person who fails to appear as required by a proclamation issued under Section 84 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita  can be punished with imprisonment for up to three years, a fine, or both. Additionally, community service may be imposed as a punishment.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 11:

Under Section 208 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which of the following would constitute an offense?

  1. Missing a court appearance due to illness without prior notification.
  2. Willfully failing to attend when legally summoned by a public servant, such as a judge or magistrate.
  3. Attending a court hearing but failing to provide the required documents.
  4.  Appearing in court but leaving the premises before the session concludes.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 : Willfully failing to attend when legally summoned by a public servant, such as a judge or magistrate.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 11 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 2.

Key Points 

Explanation:

Section 208 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 applies when a person willfully fails to attend a summons or order from a public servant (e.g., judge, magistrate) when they are legally bound to attend. If someone misses a summons deliberately or leaves before being allowed to, it is an offense under this section.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 12:

What is the punishment for absconding in order to avoid being served with a summons, notice, or order from a public servant, according to Section 206 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita? 

  1. Imprisonment for a term extending to one year, or a fine of up to 50,000 rupees, or both.
  2. Simple imprisonment for a term extending to two months, or a fine of up to 3,000 rupees, or both.
  3. Simple imprisonment for a term extending to one month, or a fine of up to 5,000 rupees, or both.
  4. Simple imprisonment for a term extending to six months, or a fine of up to 10,000 rupees, or both.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Simple imprisonment for a term extending to one month, or a fine of up to 5,000 rupees, or both.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 12 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 3.

Key Points 

Explanation:

  • According to  Section 206,of  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 “anyone who absconds to avoid being served with a summons, notice, or order from a legally competent public servant can be punished with simple imprisonment for up to one month or a fine of up to 5,000 rupees, or both. This is applicable for general cases where the summons or notice is not related to attendance or production of documents.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 13:

Under Section 220, what type of offense is committed when someone illegally bids or purchases property during a sale by a public servant?

  1. Intentionally obstructing a lawful sale of property.
  2. Offering resistance to the authority of the public servant.
  3. Purchasing or bidding for property when under a legal incapacity.
  4. Failing to attend a public auction.

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Purchasing or bidding for property when under a legal incapacity.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 13 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 3.

Key Points

 Explanation:

  • Section 220  of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 deals with illegal purchases or bids at property sales conducted by public servants. If someone bids for property or purchases it knowing that the person (whether themselves or others) is legally incapacitated from doing so (e.g., due to a restriction), they have committed an offense. The penalty for this is imprisonment for up to one month, a fine of up to 200 rupees, or both.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 14:

What will happen if disobedience to an order causes danger to human life or safety or results in a riot?

  1.  Fine of ₹5,000
  2. Imprisonment for up to 3 months
  3. Imprisonment for up to one year or a fine of ₹5,000
  4. No punishment

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 3 : Imprisonment for up to one year or a fine of ₹5,000

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 14 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 3.

Key Points 

Explanation:

  • Section 223 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023  states that if disobedience to an order leads to a more severe consequence, such as endangering human life, health, or safety, or causing a riot or affray, the punishment is more severe. The person responsible can face imprisonment for up to one year, a fine of up to ₹5,000, or both. This part of the law is designed to ensure that violations which could lead to public unrest or harm receive stricter penalties to maintain peace and order.

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 15:

What is the penalty for threatening a person to refrain from applying for protection to a public servant?

  1. Imprisonment for up to 6 months or a fine
  2.  Imprisonment for up to 2 years or a fine
  3. Imprisonment for up to 1 year
  4. No penalty

Answer (Detailed Solution Below)

Option 2 :  Imprisonment for up to 2 years or a fine

Of Contempts Of The Lawful Authority Of Public Servants Question 15 Detailed Solution

The correct Answer is Option 2.

Key Points

 Explanation:

  • Section 225 of  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 deals with threatening a person to prevent them from applying for protection from a public servant. This type of threat is aimed at preventing an individual from seeking legal recourse or protection. Such acts of coercion are punishable with imprisonment for up to two years or a fine. The intent of this law is to protect the individual's right to seek justice and protection from harm.
Get Free Access Now
Hot Links: teen patti pro teen patti master new version teen patti real cash 2024