Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice MCQ Quiz - Objective Question with Answer for Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice - Download Free PDF
Last updated on Mar 25, 2025
Latest Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice MCQ Objective Questions
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 1:
What actions are covered under Section 242 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,, regarding false personation in a legal context?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 1 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 4.
Key Points
Explanation:
- Section 242 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,covers acts of false personation where an individual assumes someone else's identity to take actions in a legal proceeding. This includes making false admissions, confessions, causing any process to be issued, becoming bail or security, or doing anything else related to a suit or criminal prosecution under an assumed identity.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 2:
Which section talks about "Giving false information respecting an offence committed" under Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 2 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is Option 2
Key Points Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Section 240: Giving False Information Respecting an Offence Committed
Whoever, knowing or having reason to believe that an offence has been committed, gives any information respecting that offence which he knows or believes to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
Explanation: In sections 238 and 239 and in this section, the word offence includes any act committed at any place out of India, which, if committed in India, would be punishable under any of the following sections, namely, 103, 105, 307, sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of section 309, sub-sections (2), (3), (4) and (5) of section 310, 311, 312, clauses (f) and (g) of section 326, sub-sections (4), (6), (7) and (8) of section 331, clauses (a) and (b) of section 332.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 3:
What is the maximum punishment for making a false claim in court under Section 246?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 3 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is Option 2.
Key Points
- Section 246 of BNS, 2023 provides Dishonestly Making False Claim in Court
- Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly, or with intent to injure or annoy any person, makes in a Court any claim which he knows to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine.
- If A knowingly files a lawsuit against B, claiming damages for an incident that never occurred, intending to annoy or harm B, A has committed an offence under this section.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 4:
Under BNS, section 246, what constitutes the offense of dishonestly making a_____________.
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 4 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is Option 2.
Key Points Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Section 246: Dishonestly Making False Claim in Court
- Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly, or with intent to injure or annoy any person, makes in a Court any claim which he knows to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine.
- If A knowingly files a lawsuit against B, claiming damages for an incident that never occurred, intending to annoy or harm B, A has committed an offence under this section.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 5:
Under Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, what is the maximum imprisonment term for fraudulently suffering a decree after it has been satisfied?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 5 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is Option 2.
Key PointsBharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Section 245: Fraudulently Suffering Decree for Sum Not Due
- Whoever fraudulently causes or suffers a decree or order to be passed against him at the suit of any person for a sum not due or for a larger sum than is due to such person or for any property or interest in property to which such person is not entitled, or fraudulently causes or suffers a decree or order to be executed against him after it has been satisfied, or for anything in respect of which it has been satisfied, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
- Illustration:
- A institutes a suit against Z. Z, knowing that A is likely to obtain a decree against him, fraudulently suffers a judgment to pass against him for a larger amount at the suit of B, who has no just claim against him, in order that B, either on his own account or for the benefit of Z, may share in the proceeds of any sale of Z’s property which may be made under A’s decree. Z has committed an offence under this section.
Top Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice MCQ Objective Questions
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 6:
What actions are covered under Section 242 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,, regarding false personation in a legal context?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 6 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 4.
Key Points
Explanation:
- Section 242 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,covers acts of false personation where an individual assumes someone else's identity to take actions in a legal proceeding. This includes making false admissions, confessions, causing any process to be issued, becoming bail or security, or doing anything else related to a suit or criminal prosecution under an assumed identity.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 7:
Under BNS, section 246, what constitutes the offense of dishonestly making a_____________.
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 7 Detailed Solution
The correct answer is Option 2.
Key Points Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Section 246: Dishonestly Making False Claim in Court
- Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly, or with intent to injure or annoy any person, makes in a Court any claim which he knows to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine.
- If A knowingly files a lawsuit against B, claiming damages for an incident that never occurred, intending to annoy or harm B, A has committed an offence under this section.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 8:
What does the term "offence" include under the Explanation of Section 253 of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 8 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 4.
Key Points
Explanation:
- Under the Explanation of Section 253 of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , the term "offence" includes acts or omissions committed outside India, provided that, if committed in India, the act would be punishable as an offence. The section extends to cases where the person is liable to be apprehended or detained in India, such as under extradition laws.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 9:
What penalty does a person face under Section 237 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, for using a false declaration knowingly?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 9 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 3.Key Points
Explanation:
- Section 237 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, provides that if a person corruptly uses or attempts to use a false declaration, knowing it to be false in any material point, they will face the same punishment as someone who gives false evidence. This punishment generally involves imprisonment with or without a fine, depending on the specifics of the case.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 10:
Under Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,, if a person knowingly uses or attempts to use false evidence, what is the punishment they will face?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 10 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 3.
Key Points
Explanation:
- Section 233 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, specifies that anyone who corruptly uses or attempts to use evidence that they know to be false or fabricated will be punished in the same manner as if they had given or fabricated false evidence. The punishment for giving or fabricating false evidence includes imprisonment with or without a fine, and this also applies to the individual who uses false evidence knowingly.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 11:
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 11 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 3.
Key Points
Explanation:
- According to Section 231 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,, if a person gives or fabricates false evidence intending to cause someone to be convicted of an offence that is punishable by life imprisonment or imprisonment for a term of seven years or more, the person providing the false evidence will be punished in the same manner as the person convicted of the offence. This means the person could face life imprisonment or a term of imprisonment (which may extend to ten years), with or without a fine. The punishment corresponds to the severity of the offence the falsely accused person would have faced.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 12:
Under Section 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,, what is the punishment for causing the disappearance of evidence to screen an offender when the offence committed is punishable with death?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 12 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 2.
Key Points
Explanation:
- According to Section 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,,, if someone causes the disappearance of evidence or gives false information with the intention of screening an offender from legal punishment, and the offence committed is punishable by death, the person can face imprisonment for a term of up to 7 years, along with a fine.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 13:
Which of the following statements is true regarding Section 244 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 13 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 3.
Key Points
Explanation:
- Section 244 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, criminalizes the fraudulent claim, acceptance, or receipt of property to prevent it from being seized as forfeited or in execution of a court order. It applies when someone falsely claims property they have no rightful claim to, with the intent of preventing its lawful seizure under court orders.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 14:
According to Section 253 of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term extending to one year but not exceeding ten years, what is the punishment for harbouring the offender?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 14 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 2.
Key Points
Explanation:
- When the offence for which the person is being apprehended is punishable with imprisonment for up to 10 years, the punishment for harbouring or concealing that person is imprisonment for up to one-fourth of the longest term of imprisonment provided for the offence, or a fine, or both.
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 15:
According to Section 253of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 , which of the following individuals is exempt from the punishment for harbouring or concealing an offender?
Answer (Detailed Solution Below)
Of False Evidence And Offences Against Public Justice Question 15 Detailed Solution
The Correct Answer is option 2.
Key Points
Explanation:
Section 253 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 includes an exception to the punishment for harbouring or concealing an offender. The spouse of the person to be apprehended is exempt from the punishment, meaning that if the offender’s spouse conceals or harbours them, they are not liable for the punishment under this section.